This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

7.5(q)

FOIA

Statutorily-confidential record set referenced via Sec. 7.5(q)

Statutorily-confidential record set referenced via Sec. 7.5(q)

Read the full statute text on /statutes →

0 upheld (no violation found) · 3 rejected (violation found) · 2 closed / insufficient info / other, out of 5 documents.

Not legal advice, and not a per-exemption ruling — this reflects each document's overall disposition. See the FAQ disclaimer.

How the Public Access Counselor has treated 7.5(q)

Section 7.5(q) incorporates confidentiality protections found in other Illinois statutes. In these decisions, the relevant statute was the Personnel Record Review Act, which was invoked for performance evaluations, complaints against staff, and other personnel disciplinary material.

Requests involved schools, a park district, and other public bodies seeking evaluations, complaints, and personnel files. The PAC did not treat all personnel material the same. It upheld withholding of actual performance evaluations, but found a notice to remedy attached to a board resolution was not a confidential evaluation and found complaints that were not formal disciplinary actions did not qualify. Other matters were resolved on different grounds, such as privacy redactions or the absence of a duty to create aggregated records.

At a glance: 5 documents(0 binding opinions, 5 determination letters). Most often cited alongside: 7(1)(a) (Federal/State-law confidentiality — or public defender case files, for documents issued under the other amendment version) (3); 7(1)(b) (Private information) (2); 7(1)(c) (Personal privacy) (2); 7(1)(j)(ii) (Peer evaluation of faculty) (1); 7(1)(q) (Licensing/employment exam questions and scoring keys) (1).

Recurring issues

Practical points

Summary drafted from the linked decisions and checked against them; read the decisions themselves before relying on it. Not legal advice.

All 5 documents citing 7.5(q)