This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

FOIA section 2(c)

FOIA

5 ILCS 140/2(c). Section 2 overview: Defines the Act's key terms: what counts as a “public body” (state agencies, counties, cities, school districts, and their subcommittees), who counts as a “requester,” what a “public record” is, what makes a request a “commercial purpose” or “recurrent” request (which get different response rules), and other terms used throughout the Act.

19 issues across 17 determination letters:5 violation found · 13 no violation · 1 no determination / resolved.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Authorities the Bureau cites most on this issue

How to challenge a denial on this issue

AI-generated summary of the decisions listed on this page, with each point linked to the letters it comes from. Determination letters are not binding precedent and this is not legal advice. Open the letter and check the PDF before relying on any point.

When a challenge is strong

  • The public body claims that extracting data from an existing database would create a new record, but the data can be retrieved by running simple queries that the database already supports. FOIA requires disclosure of existing data that can be extracted with routine database queries; producing such data is not creating a new record.Based on: n.d. · Property assessment documentation…
  • The public body has not searched officials' personal email accounts or mobile devices for messages related to public business, and responsive texts or emails are known to exist. Text messages and emails concerning public business, even if sent or stored on personal devices, are public records, and the body must search those accounts and devices upon request.Based on: n.d. · Library trustees' communications … · n.d. · A mayor's text messages with city…
  • Electronic communications were sent or received by a member of the public body during a public meeting and those communications relate to the business being conducted. Such communications qualify as public records under FOIA because they pertain to public business and involve a public official acting in their capacity during a meeting.Based on: n.d. · Park district officials' communic…
  • The public body withholds portions of aggregated documents (e.g., agenda packets) as non-responsive, but those portions actually relate to the request. Records must be liberally classified as responsive; isolated records within a larger document that connect to the request cannot be dismissed simply because they are part of a compilation.Based on: n.d. · Records concerning a specific pro…

When the public body usually wins

Points to put in your letter

Common mistakes

Facts to gather first

  • Whether the information can be extracted by an existing database query or report function (e.g., screen shots of query options, data fields).
  • Names of officials who may have used personal devices, the approximate date range, and the subject matter showing the communications pertain to public business.
  • Evidence that communications occurred during a specific meeting (agenda item, time, identity of sender/recipient) and the topic related to public business.
  • A clear description of the exact records sought, not just the topic – format, approximate date, sender/recipient, and subject matter.

These notes are based on non-binding determination letters and only reflect the specific facts of those cases; each situation depends on its own facts, and verifying the actual PDF decisions is essential before relying on any point.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: foia-2-c.json.

Violation found (5)

No violation (13)

No determination / resolved (1)